Print

Madam Whiplash will never run out of punters

A successful young British actress has just experienced one of those “I want to be alone” moments. While trekking in the Himalayas, Keira Knightley had noticed that what she liked most about her holiday was the fact that no one knew who she was. She had, she told a magazine interviewer, begun to see herself as “a tiny, insignificant speck – something I really needed”.

Cue the usual sneers. Ever since the first camera bulb flashed, there have been complaints from the rich, beautiful and envied about the heart-breaking loneliness of fame. If a film star truly likes the idea of being a tiny, insignificant speck, it could be fairly argued that the place to find out what it is like is not in the foothills of the Himalayas but on the Northern Line, packed into an underground carriage with smelly commuters during the rush hour. Just as the public may be seduced by a fantasy version of fame, so the famous are prone now and then to romanticising the joys of ordinariness.

But there is more to this cri de coeur than actorly showboating. Anyone doubting Knightley’s claim that “the celebrity thing is completely crazy” (her thinness has recently been associated with the debate surrounding anorexia) need look no further than the recent life and cuttings of another sloe-eyed English beauty, Kate Moss. What can explain the sudden elevation of a successful, moderately famous model into a celebrity so fascinating that newspapers are unwilling to let a day pass without publishing a photograph of her and that fans queue for hours to buy clothes with her name on the label?

She has not achieved anything new: she struts, pouts and looks sexily stroppy in the way that she has always done. It is her life that has propelled her public profile into full-blown craziness. She was photographed Hoovering white powder up her nose; she is the girlfriend of a famously self-destructive pop star. Neither the toot nor the relationship, one assumes, was inspired by a need for publicity, but the effect on Moss’s career has been extraordinary. It has been propelled into the stratosphere.

It is pointless to blame Kate Moss for a bizarre situation in which the worse shape a person appears to be in, the more successful, interesting and desirable she will become. The sickness seems to lie within a ghoulish public, hooked on sensation and misery in the lives of the famous. Now bored of drama and stories that have been made up, people are hungry for real pain and real joy as experienced by real, preferably attractive, celebrities.

Here is the joy of the downward-spiral story: once it is seriously under way, an orgasm of public emotion is virtually assured. A story like that of Kate Moss and Pete Doherty can lead to tragedy, opening the floodgates of Diana-esque guilt and recrimination, or to redemption, with joyful confidences shared on a chat-show sofa, a heart-rending autobiography and general gladness at the fortitude of the human spirit. Whether the public tears are of sympathy or of joy matters little, so long as that sharp moment of shared feeling has been delivered.

Like others before her, Keira Knightley has discovered that the problems begin when the desired public figure is not obligingly self-destructive. Such is the lust for second-hand pain that the public has become like a punter in a house of correction, with the media acting as an eager Madam Whiplash. If the tragic celebrity of the moment turns out not to be tragic at all, the press will do its best to remedy the situation.

So an actress who, until that moment, has been annoyingly balanced and sane is reported, probably on a website for weirdos, to be anorexic. Even if the actress wins a libel case and proves in court that the story-line chosen for her is a lie, the game has begun. She may not be anorexic herself but now she is associated with anorexia in the public mind; when a teenager starves herself to death trying to look thin, the name of the actress is invoked. She has become the cause of misery, even death, among those that admire her. How does that make her feel? she is asked. If she still clings doggedly to the illusion that she is not tragic but normal, then the next step will be to photograph and report her every move – eating, not eating, trying (very suspicious, this) to hide from cameras. Eventually she will crack, or play along with the game.

It is everywhere, this hankering for a drama which will provide that sharp, bracing hit of public emotion and confirm some plonking verity of the moment about addiction, ambition, desire and, of course, fame. People like Knightley might with justification blame the media but, as every Madam Whiplash knows, the true malaise lies within the punter.

  • Chris Rust

    It’s not a trivial issue that the researchers here don’t seem to have any notion of irony or context. If McCartney is saying old people are unloveable how come so many oldies belt that song out at their 64th birthday parties? It’s an affectionate song about love persisting despite the inevitable effects of getting older, what could be more positive?

    But there’s something quite sinister here, the conclusions of the article say:
    “It is imagined that the negative representations of age and ageing can be dispiriting and confidence and esteem lowering for older people and that more scrutiny of these texts by censorship boards should be exercised.”

    In other words it’s a manifesto for the thought police to start telling artists what to do, based on a particularly numb piece of research. Decidedly chilling.